I have an MRI booked — do my tattoos or piercings matter?
MRI scans with tattoos and piercings
Your tattoos are almost certainly fine — the risk is real but very rare and, in every published case, minor and fully recovered. Your piercings are the practical problem: they normally have to come out, and if one is still healing that needs planning rather than panic.
The answer where you are
| Where | Who decides | Tattoo | Piercing |
|---|---|---|---|
| United States Evidence — prospective study | The Rhineland Study (population-based 3T MRI) | Not established | Not established |
| United States Evidence — systematic review | Systematic review of MRI radiofrequency thermal injury | Not established | Not established |
| United States Guidance — body jewelry | Shellock, Signals (ISMRM Section for MR Technologists) | Not established | Not established |
United States — Evidence — prospective study
3,639 people scanned at 3T, 305 with tattoos or permanent make-up. Zero adverse events.
The authors concluded that most passive implants, tattoos and permanent make-up are eligible for 3 Tesla MRI research, and that relaxing the usual exclusions allowed 16.6% more people to be included than standard criteria would have.
Safety of Tattoos, Permanent Make-Up, and Medical Implants in Population-Based 3T MRI: The Rhineland Study (2022) · source · checked 2026-07-22
United States — Evidence — systematic review
17 published reports in the whole literature, all with full, fast recovery and no lasting effects.
Recommends that patients be warned to press the buzzer immediately if any discomfort is felt, and that a cold compress may be applied where a tattoo will be in the radiofrequency field. Explicitly warns this must NOT be a wet towel, which "can create a conductive loop and risk of burns via this mechanism". For patients with reduced ability to communicate, prophylactic cold compress is suggested.
Systematic review of MRI safety literature in relation to radiofrequency thermal injury prevention · source · checked 2026-07-22
United States — Guidance — body jewelry
Metallic body piercing jewelry should be removed before entering the MR environment.
Where jewelry cannot be removed, the patient should be informed of the risks (movement, heating, and in extreme cases serious injury) and ferromagnetic pieces stabilised, for example with tape or a bandage. The patient must be instructed to tell the operator immediately if any heating or unusual sensation occurs. ⚠️ This guidance dates from 2003 and we found no more recent equivalent statement.
Shellock FG, "MRI and Body Piercing Jewelry", Signals (referencing Signals No. 45, Issue 2, p. 7, 2003) · source · checked 2026-07-22
Start here, because the internet will frighten you
Search this subject and you will find burn stories with no sense of how often it happens. Here is
the count.
A systematic review of the entire published literature found 17 reported incidents involving
tattoos or permanent make-up and MRI — **all of them with full, fast recovery and no lasting
effects. Separately, the FDA received six reports between 2008 and 2017**.
And when researchers went looking prospectively, they found nothing at all. **The Rhineland Study
(2022) scanned 3,639 people at 3 Tesla, of whom 305 had tattoos or permanent make-up**.
Not one adverse event. The authors concluded that tattoos and permanent make-up are eligible
for 3T scanning, and noted that relaxing the usual exclusions let them include **16.6% more
people** than the standard criteria would have.
That matters more than it sounds. Being frightened out of a diagnostic scan is itself a harm.
If a doctor has asked for an MRI, the tattoo is not the thing to worry about.
Why a tattoo can heat at all
Some inks — historically dark ones, particularly those containing iron oxides — conduct
electricity. An MRI scanner uses powerful radiofrequency pulses, and a conductive loop in the skin
can pick that energy up and warm. A tattoo with long continuous lines, or one shaped like a
closed ring, is the geometry most often described.
What that feels like, in the reports where it happened, is a tingling or warmth during the
scan — not afterwards. It is immediate, and that is exactly why the precaution below works.
What to actually do about a tattoo
- Tell the radiographer you have tattoos, and where. They will not be surprised and it is not
a problem. Do this at the booking stage if you can.
- Speak up the moment anything feels warm. You will be given a buzzer. Use it. The review's
own wording is that reactions "have been reported by patients instantaneously" — so the person
in the scanner is the sensor.
- A cold compress can be used on a tattoo that will be in the radiofrequency field.
- ⚠️ Not a wet towel. The same review is explicit: a wet compress "can create a conductive
loop and risk of burns via this mechanism". This is the detail nobody mentions, and it turns a
sensible precaution into the very thing it was meant to prevent.
If you cannot communicate during the scan — sedated, or unable to press a buzzer — the review
suggests a cold compress applied in advance is prudent, precisely because the usual safeguard
depends on you being able to say something.
Piercings: the part that actually affects you
This is the practical problem, and it has nothing to do with your tattoos.
Metallic body jewelry is normally removed before you go anywhere near the scanner. Three
separate reasons, and only one of them is the one people expect:
- It can move. A magnetic piece can pull. Depending on where it is, that ranges from an odd
sensation to something worse.
- It can heat. Anything electrically conducting can warm in the radiofrequency field.
- It ruins the picture. Metal distorts the image around it. If the scan is of your head and
you have facial piercings, the thing the doctor needs to see may be the thing the jewelry
obscures.
"But mine is titanium and titanium is not magnetic." True, and it does not settle it. Not
magnetic is not the same as not conductive, and it is not the same as not showing up on the image.
The department decides, not the internet, and they are the ones who will have to repeat the scan
if it comes out unreadable.
If a piece genuinely cannot be removed, say so before the day. It is a normal conversation and
there are options — stabilising it, adjusting the scan, or working around it. What does not help
is arriving with it in and hoping.
If your piercing is still healing
Here is the situation nobody writes about, and it is the one that actually causes distress.
A piercing that is not yet healed can shrink or close quickly once the jewelry is out —
sometimes within hours, occasionally faster, depending on the piercing and how new it is. So the
person with a two-week-old piercing and an MRI on Thursday is caught between two real problems.
Do not solve this on the day. Ring the radiography department in advance and say plainly: this
piercing is N weeks old, it may close if it comes out, what do you advise. And ask your piercer the
same question. Between them you will get a plan — which may be a non-metallic retainer, may be
taking it out and accepting a re-pierce, and may be that for your particular scan it does not
matter.
What you should not do is take it out yourself at the last minute in a hospital corridor, or lie
about having it.
What this page cannot tell you
Every MRI department has its own protocol, and they are not identical. Field strength differs
between scanners, the part of you being scanned changes what is in the radiofrequency field, and
a department may be stricter than the published research for perfectly good reasons of its own.
Nothing here overrides what the people running your scan tell you on the day.
What we could not establish
We could not establish a single authoritative rule for how long a healing piercing can be left without jewelry before it closes — it varies by piercing, by person and by how new it is, and we found no primary source willing to give a figure. We also could not verify which specific non-metallic retainer materials individual MRI departments accept, because that is set locally. Ask both your piercer and the department rather than relying on a number from a website. The technologists' guidance on jewelry removal cited here dates from 2003 and we could not find a more recent equivalent statement, though the underlying physics has not changed.
Every source on this page was read on 2026-07-22. Rules change — if you are relying on this for something that matters, follow the source link and check.